網(wǎng)站介紹 關于我們 聯(lián)系方式 友情鏈接 廣告業(yè)務 幫助信息
1998-2022 ChinaKaoyan.com Network Studio. All Rights Reserved. 滬ICP備12018245號
今年的英語一第四篇文章是一篇時效非常強的文章,節(jié)選自The Wall Street Journal Online華爾街日報在線,是去年2013年7月1日發(fā)布的文章。下面是文章的全文呈現(xiàn),只是真題把原文中最后四段合成了一段。文章的結構非常完整,設題的角度也和歷年真題如出一轍。
Illiberal Education and the 'Heart of the Matter'
Monday, July 1st, 2013
From The Wall Street Journal Online
‘The Heart of the Matter,” the just-released report by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, deserves praise for affirming the importance of the humanities and social sciences to the prosperity and security of liberal democracy in America. Regrettably, however, the report’s failure to address the true nature of the crisis facing liberal education may cause more harm than good.
In 2010, leading congressional Democrats and Republicans sent letters to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences asking that it identify actions that could be taken by “federal, state and local governments, universities, foundations, educators, individual benefactors and others” to “maintain national excellence in humanities and social scientific scholarship and education.”
In response, the American Academy formed the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences, with Duke University President Richard Brodhead and retired Exelon CEO John Rowe as co-chairmen. Among the commission’s 51 members are top-tier-university presidents, scholars, lawyers, judges, and business executives, as well as prominent figures from diplomacy, filmmaking, music and journalism.
The goals identified in the report are generally admirable. Because representative government presupposes an informed citizenry, the report supports full literacy; stresses the study of history and government, particularly American history and American government; and encourages the use of new digital technologies.
To encourage innovation and competition, the report calls for increased investment in research, the crafting of coherent curricula that improve students’ ability to solve problems and communicate effectively in the 21st century, increased funding for teachers and the encouragement of scholars to bring their learning to bear on the great challenges of the day. The report also advocates greater study of foreign languages, international affairs and the expansion of study abroad programs.
One of the more novel ideas in the report is the creation of a order viagra “Culture Corps” in cities and town across America to “transmit humanistic and social scientific expertise from one generation to the next.”
Unfortunately, despite 2½ years in the making, “The Heart of the Matter” never gets to the heart of the matter: the illiberal nature of liberal education at our leading colleges and universities.
The commission ignores that for several decades America’s colleges and universities have produced graduates who don’t know the content and character of liberal education and are thus deprived of its benefits. Sadly, the spirit of inquiry once at home on campus has been replaced by the use of the humanities and social sciences as vehicles for disseminating “progressive,” or left-liberal propaganda.
We know from the extensive documentation that William F. Buckley Jr. provided in his stellar critique of American academia, “God and Man at Yale,” first published in 1951, that this propagandizing extends back at least to the middle of the 20th century.
Today, professors routinely treat the progressive interpretation of history and progressive public policy as the proper subject of study while portraying conservative or classical liberal ideas—such as free markets, self-reliance and a distrust of central planning—as falling outside the boundaries of routine, and sometimes legitimate, intellectual investigation.
Meanwhile, courses proliferate on highly specialized topics—Muslims in movies, gay and lesbian gardeners, the mathematical formalization of political decision making, for example—that closely correspond to professors’ niche research interests but contribute little to students’ grasp of the broad sweep of Western civilization and its literary, philosophical and religious masterpieces.
Through speech codes, endless seminars and workshops designed to teach students how to avoid “offensive” speech—and by handling sexual harassment and sexual-assault allegations with procedures that undermine the presumption of innocence—universities teach students to discount free speech and due process.
The American Academy of Arts and Sciences displays great enthusiasm for liberal education. Yet its report may well set back reform by obscuring the depth and breadth of the challenge that Congress asked it to illuminate.
From The Wall Street Journal Online
來源未注明“中國考研網(wǎng)”的資訊、文章等均為轉載,本網(wǎng)站轉載出于傳遞更多信息之目的,并不意味著贊同其觀點或證實其內容的真實性,如涉及版權問題,請聯(lián)系本站管理員予以更改或刪除。如其他媒體、網(wǎng)站或個人從本網(wǎng)站下載使用,必須保留本網(wǎng)站注明的"稿件來源",并自負版權等法律責任。
來源注明“中國考研網(wǎng)”的文章,若需轉載請聯(lián)系管理員獲得相應許可。
聯(lián)系方式:chinakaoyankefu@163.com
掃碼關注
了解考研最新消息
網(wǎng)站介紹 關于我們 聯(lián)系方式 友情鏈接 廣告業(yè)務 幫助信息
1998-2022 ChinaKaoyan.com Network Studio. All Rights Reserved. 滬ICP備12018245號